Yes, Turnitin can detect Quillbot paraphrasing, and it's been getting better at it since mid-2024. If you're banking on Quillbot to clean up your AI-generated text before submission, you're playing a game you're increasingly likely to lose.

In July 2024, Turnitin launched a dedicated AI paraphrasing detection feature built specifically to catch text that's been run through paraphrasing tools. It doesn't just flag raw AI output anymore. It now identifies text that was AI-generated and then paraphrased, using a separate detection layer with distinct visual highlighting: red for AI-generated content, yellow for AI-paraphrased content. Quillbot was one of the primary tools Turnitin trained against.

Real-world testing shows Turnitin detects 64% to 99% of Quillbot-paraphrased content, depending on the mode and the original text. In one independent test, every single Quillbot-processed sample was flagged by Turnitin's detection. It's like putting a fresh coat of paint on a car with engine problems. Looks different on the outside, but the real issues haven't changed.

Turnitin's AI detection engine uses a proprietary transformer-based deep learning model that analyzes text holistically. Unlike simpler detectors that rely primarily on perplexity and burstiness metrics, Turnitin's model was trained on massive datasets of both human and AI-generated text, learning complex patterns across thousands of features simultaneously.

Quillbot's approach is fundamentally synonym-based. It swaps words for alternatives and shuffles sentence elements around. But here's where it falls apart: those swaps don't change the overall statistical pattern of the text. The sentence lengths stay roughly uniform. The transitions remain predictably smooth. The vocabulary distribution still looks machine-generated. Turnitin's deep learning model picks up on these structural fingerprints regardless of whether individual words have changed.

The July 2024 paraphrasing detection update added a second layer specifically trained on paraphraser output. Turnitin's team fed thousands of texts processed through tools like Quillbot into their system and taught it to recognize the telltale signs: the slightly awkward synonym choices, the preserved grammatical skeletons, and the lack of genuine human messiness that natural writing contains. From July 2024 through August 2025, two models ran simultaneously in production, one catching raw AI text and another catching AI text that had been paraphrased.

As of 2026, Turnitin's model detects content from GPT-5 and its variants, Gemini models, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and LLaMA, both in raw form and after paraphrasing.

Quillbot offers 7+ paraphrasing modes in 2026, including Standard, Fluency, Formal, Creative, and several others. We looked at independent testing data to see how different modes hold up against Turnitin's latest detection.

The results are consistent across multiple independent tests: no Quillbot mode reliably brings AI-generated text below safe detection thresholds. In one test, Quillbot reduced an AI detection score from 94% to 38%, which sounds decent until you realize that's still well above the 20% threshold where Turnitin starts displaying specific AI scores. Another independent evaluation found Turnitin detected anomalies in 45% of Quillbot-processed submissions. And in the most comprehensive test we found, Turnitin flagged detection scores between 64% and 99% across all Quillbot-paraphrased samples.

Creative mode typically performs best because it makes the most aggressive changes to the original text. But "best" is relative when you're still getting flagged. Standard and Fluency modes make more conservative changes and leave more of the original AI patterns intact, resulting in higher detection scores. Even Custom mode with maximum synonym replacement can't address the deeper structural patterns that Turnitin's transformer model is trained to catch.

Turnitin isn't the only detector catching Quillbot. Here's how other major detectors handle Quillbot-paraphrased content in 2026.

[GPTZero](/blog/bypass-gptzero-ai-detection) has added a dedicated paraphrase detection feature that can specifically label text as "possible AI paraphrase detected." Its 7-component detection system, which includes perplexity, burstiness, and additional analysis layers, catches many Quillbot-processed texts because the underlying statistical patterns survive synonym swapping.

[Originality.ai](/blog/bypass-originality-ai-detection) is particularly tough on Quillbot. Its deep learning classifier was specifically trained on paraphrased and humanized content, and claims 97% accuracy on content processed through bypass tools. Quillbot's surface-level changes are exactly what Originality.ai was designed to see through. In one test, Copyleaks detected 60% of AI-paraphrased texts, or 6 out of 10 samples.

Copyleaks uses character-level and sentence-level scanning that catches micro-patterns surviving basic paraphrasing. However, its performance on Quillbot-processed text is somewhat uneven, suggesting that Copyleaks finds some paraphrasing modes harder to detect than others.

The bottom line: if you're using Quillbot to dodge AI detection, you're fighting an uphill battle against every major detector, not just Turnitin. Each one has either added or improved its paraphrased content detection since 2024.

There's a fundamental difference between paraphrasing and humanization, and understanding it is the key to beating AI detectors. We break this down in detail in our AI paraphraser vs AI humanizer comparison. Paraphrasing changes words. That's it. It takes "The research indicates a significant correlation" and turns it into "The study shows a notable connection." Different words, same robotic pattern. Same predictable structure. Same dead giveaway.

Humanization goes deeper. Way deeper. It changes the actual *patterns*: the rhythm of your sentences, the unpredictability of your word choices, the natural inconsistencies that make human writing feel human. Real people write messy. They start sentences with "But." They use fragments. Then they drop a 40-word sentence out of nowhere. That variation is what AI detectors measure, and it's exactly what paraphrasing tools like Quillbot don't touch.

The Perkins et al. (2024) study, published in the *International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education*, demonstrated this gap directly. They found that basic automated paraphrasing had limited effectiveness against AI detectors, but when students combined paraphrasing with manual editing and personal details, detection accuracy dropped significantly. The combination matters because manual editing introduces the genuine human messiness that no automated tool can replicate on its own.

You can swap every single word in a sentence, but if the structural DNA stays the same, Turnitin's transformer model will still catch it. That's why Turnitin now has a separate yellow highlight specifically for paraphrased AI text. They're not just catching you. They're showing your professor that you tried to hide it.

This is the question that matters most, and a lot of students don't realize there's a difference.

Quillbot is a paraphraser. It operates at the word and phrase level. It swaps synonyms, rearranges clauses, and adjusts phrasing. The result reads differently on the surface, but the underlying sentence patterns, structural flow, and statistical fingerprint stay largely unchanged. That's why AI detectors can still identify it.

AI humanizers like UndetectedGPT operate at the pattern level. Instead of swapping words, they restructure the statistical properties that detectors actually measure: sentence length variation, vocabulary distribution, paragraph rhythm, transition unpredictability, and structural flow. The content keeps its meaning, but the way it's expressed changes at the level that detection algorithms care about.

Think of it this way: if AI text is a robot in a costume, Quillbot changes the costume. UndetectedGPT changes the way the robot walks, talks, and behaves so it doesn't look like a robot anymore. Turnitin's paraphrasing detection was built to see through costume changes. It has a much harder time with genuine behavioral transformation.

In independent 2026 testing, Quillbot typically reduced AI detection scores by 40-60% at best, still leaving text well above safe thresholds. Pattern-level humanizers consistently bring scores below detection thresholds because they address the actual signals detectors measure, not just the surface-level text.

Here's something most students don't consider: using Quillbot on AI-generated text can actually make your situation worse, not better.

Since Turnitin now has a dedicated paraphrasing detection layer that highlights AI-paraphrased text in yellow (distinct from the red used for raw AI text), running your essay through Quillbot doesn't just fail to hide the AI. It actively tells your professor that you tried to hide it. That's a significant difference in how academic misconduct is perceived. A student who submits AI text might claim they didn't realize it was a problem. A student who ran that text through a paraphraser clearly knew it was a problem and tried to cover it up.

There's a legitimate use case for Quillbot: improving your own human-written text. If you wrote an essay yourself and want to improve the phrasing, Quillbot can help with that, and Turnitin generally doesn't flag human-written text that's been paraphrased for style improvements. The problem only arises when you're trying to disguise AI-generated content as your own.

For genuinely human-written text, Quillbot is fine. For AI-generated text, it's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. And in 2026, it's a Band-Aid that actually draws attention to the wound.

Before investing in Quillbot for AI detection purposes, it's worth knowing what you're paying for and whether it's actually worth it for that use case.

Quillbot's free plan gives you 125 words per paraphrase with access to 2 modes. That's barely enough to test a single paragraph. The Premium plan costs $19.95/month on a monthly basis, or $8.33/month if you commit to an annual plan ($99.95/year). Verified students get a discounted rate of $6.25/month on the annual plan. There's also a Teams plan at $7.50/user/month for 2-10 seats.

Premium unlocks all 7+ paraphrasing modes, unlimited word length, the grammar checker, summarizer, plagiarism checker, and translator. It's a solid writing assistant for legitimate use: grammar improvement, style refinement, and academic writing support.

But here's the thing: if your primary goal is to bypass AI detection on AI-generated content, you're paying $100+ per year for a tool that independent testing shows still gets caught by Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.ai, and Copyleaks. At that price point, a dedicated AI humanizer tool designed to actually pass detection is a significantly better investment — see our best AI humanizers ranking for the top options.

If you're already using Quillbot and getting flagged, chances are you're making one of these mistakes.

Running text through Quillbot once and calling it done. A single pass through any Quillbot mode doesn't change enough. The structural patterns of AI text survive one round of synonym swapping. Some students try multiple passes, but this often makes the text awkward and unnatural without actually fixing the detection problem.

Using Standard or Fluency mode for detection evasion. These modes make the least aggressive changes. They're designed for readability improvement, not detection bypass. If you're going to use Quillbot at all, Creative mode makes the most changes, but even that isn't enough for reliable bypass in 2026.

Assuming what works for plagiarism works for AI detection. Quillbot was originally designed to help with plagiarism detection by making text different enough from its source. AI detection is a completely different game. Plagiarism checkers compare your text to existing documents. AI detectors analyze the statistical patterns of the text itself. You can make text 100% unique and still get flagged as AI-generated.

Not checking the result before submitting. Always run your final text through an AI detector before submission. If Quillbot left you at 60% AI, you'll know to try a different approach before your professor sees it. Our free AI detector can help you pre-screen.

Ignoring that Turnitin now shows paraphrasing specifically. The yellow highlight for AI-paraphrased content means your professor sees not just AI involvement, but deliberate attempt to disguise it. This can actually make the academic misconduct conversation worse, not better.

If Quillbot operates at the word level, UndetectedGPT operates at the pattern level. Instead of swapping synonyms and hoping for the best, it restructures text to genuinely match how humans write. It adjusts sentence length variation, introduces natural imperfections, varies paragraph rhythm, and modifies the statistical patterns that Turnitin's transformer model actually measures.

The difference in approach is night and day, and so are the results. Where Quillbot typically reduces AI scores by 40-60% (still leaving text above detection thresholds), pattern-level humanization consistently brings content below the thresholds that trigger flags. Not by gaming the system with nonsense text or hidden characters, but by genuinely making the writing behave like a human wrote it at the statistical level detectors analyze.

For students who use AI as a writing aid, the smart workflow is: use AI for brainstorming and outlining, write your draft with AI assistance, then run it through UndetectedGPT to address the detection patterns, and finally add your own personal details and examples on top. That combination covers all the bases: the statistical patterns get fixed by the humanizer, and the personal touch makes it genuinely yours.